My First-Ever Written Rhetoric (Bullet Points)

Thank you, Mr. Speaker!

Motion:

„THB that we should travel not to escape life but for life not to escape us.”

I represent the side of the government. (those who agree)

My speech will consist of 6 parts:

1.     Definition of the word novelty.

2.     Correlate this with our lives.

3.     Parallel between empiricism and travelling.

4.     Substantiate my point of view by John Locke.

5.     Exemplify this with an opposition.

6.     Provide a conclusion based on sufficient evidence.


John Locke



1.     Definition of the word novelty:

·       Something that triggers our stimuli in such a way that it causes us excitement.

2.     This government believes that….

·       Humanity is inquisitive by nature.

·       Perception is the bedrock of human evolution.

·       The world is full of new adventures.

·       Point out one main in particular: travelling.

3.                3.     Parallel between empiricism and travelling:

·       The core of exploring is experience.

·       We have to scrutinize hitherto unfathomable places which is an enticing experience.

·       Needless to say that careful inspection of our surroundings plays a pivotal role in our lives in evolutionary terms either.

·       We have to expand our tabula rasa from the moment we were born and take on such pilgrimages that are of vivacity and could fill the gaps in our very lives.

4.                   4.      Substantiate my point of view by John Locke:

·       That’s what empiricism is all about, and education is as well.

·       That’s what the government is an adherent to. That’s whom I stand for, namely Enlightenment British philosopher John Locke.

 

 

5.     Exemplify this with an opposition:

Now we have to decide once and for all which option is more worthwhile out of these two:

To travel or not to travel? (That’s the question!)

·                      First option: (bad)

a)    We escape life and box ourselves within solitary confinement without even giving it a chance to gain empirical knowledge of the country to which we all belong or even the closest vicinity of the street where we live.

·                      Second option: (good)

a)    We made the decision that travelling is of paramount importance because novelty is what our deterministic life approach tells our mind to experience.

b)    Therefore, I dismantle the notion that free will and determinism may coexist together for the following reason:

Our actions are driven by physical incentives that influence mental states with behaviourism.

Mental states are biological states and biological states are connected to physical states under which we have no control.

Let me give you an example!

For instance, I go to the park not because I felt like that but because my blood supply was scarce in oxygen and I felt the emptiness in my mind, and I decided to refresh my brain by going outside that is going to the park.

Hence no free will.



Martin Luther King


6.                     6.    Conclusion:

Based on all this empirical evidence, I’ve arrived at the conclusion that travelling is of ubiquity in our lives without which hardly could we live.

Megjegyzések

Népszerű bejegyzések ezen a blogon

Euroexam Writing Test 1 - C1

Speech on Education

Verb + ing Forms and Infinitives C1