My First-Ever Written Rhetoric (Bullet Points)
Thank you, Mr. Speaker!
Motion:
„THB that we should travel not to escape life but for
life not to escape us.”
I represent the side of the government. (those who agree)
My speech will consist of 6 parts:
1. Definition of the word novelty.
2. Correlate this with our lives.
3. Parallel between empiricism and travelling.
4. Substantiate my point of view by John Locke.
5. Exemplify this with an opposition.
1. Definition of the word novelty:
·
Something
that triggers our stimuli in such a way that it causes us excitement.
2. This government believes that….
·
Humanity
is inquisitive by nature.
·
Perception
is the bedrock of human evolution.
·
The
world is full of new adventures.
·
Point
out one main in particular: travelling.
3. 3. Parallel between empiricism and travelling:
· The core of exploring is experience.
·
We
have to scrutinize hitherto unfathomable places which is an enticing
experience.
·
Needless
to say that careful inspection of our surroundings plays a pivotal role in our
lives in evolutionary terms either.
·
We
have to expand our tabula rasa from the moment we were born and take on such
pilgrimages that are of vivacity and could fill the gaps in our very lives.
4. 4. Substantiate my point of view by John Locke:
·
That’s
what empiricism is all about, and education is as well.
·
That’s
what the government is an adherent to. That’s whom I stand for, namely
Enlightenment British philosopher John Locke.
5. Exemplify this with an opposition:
Now we have to
decide once and for all which option is more worthwhile out of these two:
To travel or not to
travel? (That’s the question!)
· First
option: (bad)
a) We escape life and box ourselves within solitary
confinement without even giving it a chance to gain empirical knowledge of the
country to which we all belong or even the closest vicinity of the street where
we live.
· Second
option: (good)
a) We made the decision that travelling is of paramount
importance because novelty is what our deterministic life approach tells our
mind to experience.
b) Therefore, I dismantle the notion that free will and determinism
may coexist together for the following reason:
Our actions are driven
by physical incentives that influence mental states with behaviourism.
Mental states are
biological states and biological states are connected to physical states under
which we have no control.
Let me give you an
example!
For instance, I go
to the park not because I felt like that but because my blood supply was scarce
in oxygen and I felt the emptiness in my mind, and I decided to refresh my brain by going outside that is going to
the park.
Hence no free will.
6. 6. Conclusion:
Based on all this empirical
evidence, I’ve arrived at the conclusion that travelling is of ubiquity in our
lives without which hardly could we live.
Megjegyzések
Megjegyzés küldése